We need to check if 4443 is served through firewall and proxy, as 443 is occupied by web server.
JVB 2017-12-07 08:01:49.851 WARNING: [1381668] org.jitsi.videobridge.EndpointMessageTransport.log() SCTP connection with d7cb13ab not ready yet.JVB 2017-12-07 08:01:49.851 WARNING: [1381668] org.jitsi.videobridge.EndpointMessageTransport.log() No available transport channel, can't send a message
Starting Nmap 7.01 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2017-12-07 20:28 CETNmap scan report for meet.fairchat.net (178.63.167.183)Host is up (0.037s latency).rDNS record for 178.63.167.183: static.183.167.63.178.clients.your-server.dePORT STATE SERVICE VERSION4443/tcp open pharos?Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at https://nmap.org/submit/ .Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 129.26 secondsras@kar:~$ nmap -sV -p 4443 meet.ucom.gv.atStarting Nmap 7.01 ( https://nmap.org ) at 2017-12-07 20:52 CETNmap scan report for meet.ucom.gv.at (62.99.130.124)Host is up (0.026s latency).PORT STATE SERVICE VERSION4443/tcp open pharos?Service detection performed. Please report any incorrect results at https://nmap.org/submit/ .Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 129.22 seconds
/** * The default port that the <tt>TcpHarvester</tt> will * bind to. */ private static final int TCP_DEFAULT_PORT = 443; /** * The port on which the <tt>TcpHarvester</tt> will bind to * if no port is specifically configured, and binding to * <tt>DEFAULT_TCP_PORT</tt> fails (for example, if the process doesn't have * the required privileges to bind to a port below 1024). */private static final int TCP_FALLBACK_PORT = 4443;
Still problems with conferences with 2+ patricipants: one often drops.
Harvester addresses in /etc/jitsi/videobridge/sip-communicator.properties really improve connectivity in same LAN (tested again) (not there in meet.ucom.gv.at).
Hi @roland.alton - just adding a small note on here that I'm interested in this issue too since it appears very similar to something I've reported at https://github.com/jitsi/jitsi-meet/issues/3738 ; if there's anything we can do to collaborate and find the root cause I'd be glad to help.
Hi @jayaddison looks like we have slightly different usage scenarios. In fact we came up with the conclusion to split signalling and the videobridge as outlined here #19 (closed)
Thanks @roland.alton - I'm being a little stubborn about the single-jitsi-machine approach I'm trying to take, but thank you for the suggestion and link; I'll take that route if I can't get the conferencing working on an individual machine.