... | ... | @@ -545,6 +545,8 @@ The project was born in 2012 and not the project can be considered mature since |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Wekan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Requirements:
|
|
|
- Node.js
|
|
|
- MongoDB
|
... | ... | @@ -627,7 +629,7 @@ The project was born in 2012 and not the project can be considered mature since |
|
|
|
|
|
We need an explanation to this software, from my point of view... it's a mess, a chaos, it seems an innovative idea to establish different ideas and decentralized join points economic, management, development and experimentation, like the idea REA but through lack of understanding, consensus and difficult usability I would consider it as an experiment but never a software in production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still trying to know more in depth, the ideaología, the functions of this software, but I think that it has too many mixes...
|
|
|
I'm still trying to know more in depth, the ideology, the functions of this software, but I think that it has too many mixes...
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 domains pointing here, we don't know the server, mix together the mails and duties, the operation and reporting of failures should not go to the general.. our setup is not the software please! Must be modular. Apparently that would be the way but clearly even it is not and therefore is neither decentralized, nor kiss.
|
|
|
|
... | ... | @@ -681,6 +683,39 @@ I propose to add more documentation, modularity, technology base established and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Requirements:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Rating:[4/9]
|
|
|
- LAST UPDATE:
|
|
|
- PLUGINS/MODULES:
|
|
|
- DESCENTRALIZED: NO (only on server)
|
|
|
- DISTRIBUITED: NO
|
|
|
- CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
- KISS-MODULAR: NO
|
|
|
- DOCUMENTATION:
|
|
|
- 4 FREEDOMS FS:
|
|
|
- CONTROL VERSION:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Used in FairCOOP in:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- How to use it:
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
## KeyCloak
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Requirements:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
... | ... | |