... | ... | @@ -627,15 +627,12 @@ The project was born in 2012 and not the project can be considered mature since |
|
|
|
|
|
## ValueNetwork
|
|
|
|
|
|
We need an explanation to this software, from my point of view... it's a mess, a chaos, it seems an innovative idea to establish different ideas and decentralized join points economic, management, development and experimentation, like the idea REA but through lack of understanding, consensus and difficult usability I would consider it as an experiment but never a software in production.
|
|
|
This software is a fork from NRP-Sensorica to use and work for FREEDOM COOP
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm still trying to know more in depth, the ideology, the functions of this software, but I think that it has too many mixes...
|
|
|
Is a Value Network Accounting. Is in developed state and we are using it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 domains pointing here, we don't know the server, mix together the mails and duties, the operation and reporting of failures should not go to the general.. our setup is not the software please! Must be modular. Apparently that would be the way but clearly even it is not and therefore is neither decentralized, nor kiss.
|
|
|
We are developing something analogous to an ERP system for value networks. Might call it NRP for Network Resource Planning or OCP for Open Collaborative Platform.
|
|
|
|
|
|
To my opinion does not meet any warranty of development of free software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I propose to add more documentation, modularity, technology base established and establish a system of real development (dev-testing-production), with a version control system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Requirements:
|
|
|
- sqlite - postgreSQL
|
... | ... | @@ -648,15 +645,15 @@ I propose to add more documentation, modularity, technology base established and |
|
|
|
|
|
- Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Since we are using it
|
|
|
- We are using it
|
|
|
- We have used many resources in it
|
|
|
- The future could be the REA
|
|
|
- The future could be the REA accounting
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- It is not a software to manage work in a specific way
|
|
|
- Mix users freedomcoop, bankofthecommons and ocw
|
|
|
- It takes a lot of patience and improve the interface
|
|
|
- Do not understand
|
|
|
- I don't get to see more sources that defend the REA as an accounting system
|
|
|
- Difficult interface
|
|
|
- REA as an accounting system is not very known.
|
|
|
- Still on developer state. Needs more testing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
... | ... | @@ -667,14 +664,17 @@ I propose to add more documentation, modularity, technology base established and |
|
|
- DISTRIBUITED: NO
|
|
|
- CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
- KISS-MODULAR: NO
|
|
|
- DOCUMENTATION: NOt much
|
|
|
- DOCUMENTATION: Not much
|
|
|
- 4 FREEDOMS FS: YES AGPL
|
|
|
- CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Used in FairCOOP in:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- ocp.freedomcoop.eu
|
|
|
- ocp.bankofthecommons.coop
|
|
|
- Open Cooperative Work
|
|
|
|
|
|
- How to use it:
|
|
|
|
|
|
On Open Cooperative Work we use like a project manager and task accounting
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
... | ... | |