... | ... | @@ -16,7 +16,8 @@ Why do we have the language in the api ? What dies the language of a place/poi m |
|
|
|
|
|
# createdAt
|
|
|
What do we understand with "createdAt" ? publishingDate, Creation of the Pin on a map, creation of an organisation?
|
|
|
Maybe this is [starttime](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-starttime) but it sounds more as versioning and should be postboned.
|
|
|
Maybe this is [starttime](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-starttime) but it sounds more as versioning and should be postboned.
|
|
|
Also [published](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-published) is possible
|
|
|
|
|
|
# deleted
|
|
|
Our deleted flag sounds like a [tombstone](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-tombstone) object.
|
... | ... | @@ -30,3 +31,37 @@ The owner could be a property [attributedto](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystrea |
|
|
# place.source.platform
|
|
|
The platform could be [generator](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-generator) with on of that [actor-type](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#actor-types) e.g. an [Application](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-application) a [Service](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-service) or a [Organisation](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-organization)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# place.source.*
|
|
|
If owner and platform is an actor, then we can use [url](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-url).
|
|
|
PhoneNumber and Email are anyhow critical data! If we sometimes use activityPup, the we can reach the owner with a personal activity in his InBox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
# title
|
|
|
Sounds like [name](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-name)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# description
|
|
|
[content](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#dfn-content)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# tags
|
|
|
See [microsyntaxes](https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-vocabulary/#microsyntaxes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# verifiedTags
|
|
|
i like the idea of giving the tag an id like in this example
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
"@context": "https://www.w3.org/ns/activitystreams",
|
|
|
"name": "A thank-you note",
|
|
|
"type": "Note",
|
|
|
"content": "Thank you <a href='http://sally.example.org'>@sally</a>
|
|
|
for all your hard work!
|
|
|
"to": {
|
|
|
"name": "Sally",
|
|
|
"type": "Person",
|
|
|
"id": "http://sally.example.org"
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
"tag": {
|
|
|
"id": "http://example.org/tags/givingthanks",
|
|
|
"name": "#givingthanks"
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
Then it's possible to provide services by each plattform to ask if a tag is verified. Or receive all verified tags in common in a seperate request. |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |