|
|
# Project manager Analysis
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starting with these comparative
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_project_management_software and using only free licences
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Scrum_software
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://opensource.com/business/16/3/top-project-management-tools-2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Basic characteristics we need
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Task Management
|
|
|
* Time Tracking
|
|
|
* Discussing
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board
|
|
|
* Scrum
|
|
|
* Gantt
|
|
|
* Projects view search
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need)
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets
|
|
|
|
|
|
## How to evaluate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
I want to remove 4 Freedoms because I dont put any Not Free software to compare, and with public control version
|
|
|
|
|
|
Requirements: [Software requiments]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[]
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAST UPDATE: [ Check the last update to know the project its alive and well developed. ]
|
|
|
PLUGINS/MODULES: [ Check if has module structure what allow improve in good way. ]
|
|
|
DECENTRALIZED: [ Check if can be federate. ]
|
|
|
DISTRIBUTED: [ Check if p2p software. ]
|
|
|
CONSUMPTION: [ Comparation in energy Consumption. ]
|
|
|
KISS: [ Keep It Simple Stupid - One tool for one purpose ]
|
|
|
DOCUMENTATION: [ If there good documentation with public access ]
|
|
|
CONTROL VERSION: [ Check if have a control system with almost 3 versions develop-testing-production ]
|
|
|
USABILITY: [We need to test for real evalue, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usability_testing for that if we have time we should do it but otherwise we need to trust on people to test before.]
|
|
|
|
|
|
How we will use it:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Fengoffice
|
|
|
Fengoffice is an open source collaboration platform developed and supported by Feng Office and the OpenGoo community. It is a fully featured online office suite with a similar set of features as other online office suites, like G Suite, Microsoft Office Live, Zimbra, LibreOffice Online and Zoho Office Suite. Include project management, document management, contact management, e-mail and time management. Text documents and presentations can be created and edited online. Files can be uploaded, organized and shared, independent of file formats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
This project started before 2008 and is a very matured software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: http://www.fengoffice.com/web/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Feng_Office_Community_Edition
|
|
|
* CODE: https://sourceforge.net/projects/opengoo/files/fengoffice/
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- Apache
|
|
|
- Php
|
|
|
- Mysql
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Mature software
|
|
|
- many languages
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- Its a platform to collaborate not only a project manager
|
|
|
- Not mobile module
|
|
|
- Some Modules are propetary software
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[ 9/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: GOOD 17-09-04
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: YES
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: NO
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: YES
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES
|
|
|
* Scrum: NO
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board : NO
|
|
|
* Gantt : NO
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: NO
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: NO
|
|
|
* USABILITY:
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.muypymes.com/2009/07/31/analizamos-feng-office-la-oficina-del-futuro:
|
|
|
In general terms, Feng Office has seemed like a complete productivity suite, which can give a lot of play in an SME interested in carrying out collaborative projects among several employees, or who opt for teleworking. While its minor applications (tasks, contacts, calendars) are very well resolved and have nothing to envy other services, fails miserably in what should be their priorities: email and document management. However, if we do not have many office claims, it may be an option to consider due to its price-quality ratio.
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://project-management.softwareinsider.com/compare/47-163/Feng-Office-vs-Trello
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not agile Project Manager very traditional
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
We need to change all structure because is a complete platform more like a ERP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Tuleap
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuleap is a project management system for managing application lifecycles, Agile development and design projects, V-model, Requirement Management, IT Services Management, and so on. It is a libre and open-source project management system released under GPLv2 license.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuleap is an enterprise alternative solution to proprietary tools like CollabNet, Jira and Confluence, Crucible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The software was developed by Enalean, a company founded in 2011 is a matured software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: https://www.tuleap.org/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuleap_(project_management)
|
|
|
* CODE: https://tuleap.net/plugins/git/tuleap/tuleap/stable?p=tuleap%2Fstable.git&a=tree
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- Centos 6.5 x64 machine
|
|
|
- 1000 users, there is at least: a quad core, 4Gb RAM and 500Gb HD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Mature software
|
|
|
- many languages
|
|
|
- Completly opensource
|
|
|
- LDAP
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- Not Debian version yet
|
|
|
- Not 2Fauht yet
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[ 16/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: GOOD 17-11-04
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: YES
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: YES
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: YES
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES
|
|
|
* Kanban Board : YES
|
|
|
* Scrum: YES
|
|
|
* Gantt : YES
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: YES
|
|
|
* USABILITY: YES
|
|
|
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tuleap_(project_management)
|
|
|
https://opensource.com/business/15/1/top-project-management-tools-2015
|
|
|
"one of Top 5 open source project management tools in 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://sdtimes.com/tuleap-9-allows-software-teams-adapt-agile-workspace-needs/
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tuleap allows for agile, traditional, hybrid, or custom processes for project magament. It supports planning, sprints, tasks, reports, and more. This tool is very suitable for open source development companies, as the tool also integrates with Git, SVN, Jenkins, and more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
We can use for OCW and develop all our tech.. maybe we could change git + ocp for Tuleap
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
### EgroupWare
|
|
|
Is free open source groupware software intended for businesses from small to enterprises. Its primary functions allow users to manage contacts, appointments, projects and to-do lists. EGroupware is based on PHP. The projects spreads its software under the terms of GNU General Public License
|
|
|
|
|
|
Started on 2009 and is a matured software
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: http://www.egroupware.org/en/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/EGroupware
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/EGroupware/egroupware
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- Linux Machine x64
|
|
|
- Php
|
|
|
- Apache
|
|
|
- Email Server
|
|
|
- LDAP
|
|
|
- Mysql
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Mature software
|
|
|
- 25 languages
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- Its a platform to collaborate not only a project manager
|
|
|
- Some Modules are propetary software
|
|
|
- No mobile app
|
|
|
- No recurring task
|
|
|
- Not completly free
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[11/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: V17 17-11-15 GOOD
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: YES
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: NO
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: YES
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board : NO
|
|
|
* Scrum: NO
|
|
|
* Gantt : YES
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: YES
|
|
|
* USABILITY: NO
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://project-management.softwareinsider.com/l/43/eGroupWare
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project Manager supports both traditional project management and some of the more flexible methodologies. If you're not looking for a full-blown solution and covering a variety of project types is more important to you than the lack of this may be a good choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.open-source-guide.com/en/Solutions/Infrastructure/Messaging-email-marketing-groupware/Egroupware
|
|
|
|
|
|
Une solution qui a eu ses heures de gloire mais qui est maintenant dépassée. Au moment ou j'écris ce commentaire la synchro ActiveSync n'est uniquement que dans la version de dev communautaire. Il faut passer à la version "enterprise" (donc souscription ...) pour en bénéficier. L'activité autour des Forums est assez atone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
We need to change all structure because is a complete platform more like a ERP
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### ProjeQtOr
|
|
|
Is an Open Source project management software, focus on Quality, the software started to develop in 2003, its no very famous but cosidered matured software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE:https://www.projeqtor.org/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProjeQtOr
|
|
|
* CODE: ¿?
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- Linux Machine x64
|
|
|
- Php
|
|
|
- Apache
|
|
|
- Email Server
|
|
|
- LDAP
|
|
|
- Mysql
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Mature software
|
|
|
- Calendar
|
|
|
- Forum
|
|
|
- Allocate Resource by Skill Sets
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- Its a platform to collaborate not only a project manager
|
|
|
- Old fashion graphic style
|
|
|
- No mobile app
|
|
|
- No recurring task
|
|
|
- Not completly free
|
|
|
- Its not for more of 50 user
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[8/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: V17 17-06-25 GOOD
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: NO
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: YES
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: NO
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: NO
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board : NO
|
|
|
* Scrum: NO
|
|
|
* Gantt : YES
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: NO
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: NO
|
|
|
* USABILITY: NO
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://prhttp://project-management.softwareinsider.com/compare/167-245-814/ProjeQtOr-vs-OrangeScrum-vs-web2Projectoject-management.softwareinsider.com/compare/57-167/JIRA-vs-ProjeQtOr
|
|
|
|
|
|
Traditional style of PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
We need to use like we are using OCP and Github
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Agilefant
|
|
|
|
|
|
Its outdate from jun on 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: https://www.agilefant.com/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA:
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/Agilefant/agilefant
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- Linux Machine x64
|
|
|
- java
|
|
|
- Apache tomcat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- Its a platform to collaborate not only a project manager
|
|
|
- Old fashion graphic style
|
|
|
- No mobile app
|
|
|
- No recurring task
|
|
|
- Not completly free
|
|
|
- Its not for more of 50 user
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[9/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: 3.5.4 15-07-3 BAD
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: NO
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: YES
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: NO
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: NO
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board : YES
|
|
|
* Scrum: YES
|
|
|
* Gantt : NO
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: NO
|
|
|
* USABILITY: NO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
Sorry but i think we dont want to use this software because I feel like is abandoned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
### MyCollab
|
|
|
|
|
|
Project, Crm, Document and more … for desktop and mobile devices
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: https://community.mycollab.com/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA:
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/MyCollab/mycollab
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- Linux Machine x64
|
|
|
- java
|
|
|
- Apache tomcat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Lighting fast
|
|
|
- Risk management
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- No recurring task
|
|
|
- Its not for more of 50 user
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[12/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: v5.4.10 17-06-18 GOOD
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: NO
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: YES
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: YES
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board : YES
|
|
|
* Scrum: NO
|
|
|
* Gantt : YES
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: NO
|
|
|
* USABILITY: NO
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://project-management.zone/system/mycollab,odoo
|
|
|
|
|
|
I can't find many reviews... i think is a great unknown software
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
Sorry but i think we dont want to use this software because I feel like is abandoned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Odoo
|
|
|
Odoo is a suite of web based open source business apps
|
|
|
|
|
|
The main Odoo Apps include an Open Source CRM, Website Builder, eCommerce, Warehouse Management, Project Management, Billing & Accounting, Point of Sale, Human Resources, Marketing, Manufacturing, Purchase Management, ...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Odoo Apps can be used as stand-alone applications, but they also integrate seamlessly so you get a full-featured Open Source ERP when you install several Apps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Started to develop on 2005 and now is very matured software and with a good community developers
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: https://www.odoo.com/page/community
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Odoo
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/odoo/odoo
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- Linux Machine x64
|
|
|
- python
|
|
|
- PostgreSQL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Thinking on large enterprises
|
|
|
- Very modulable software
|
|
|
- Good messaging style
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- No recurring task
|
|
|
- Its not for more of 50 user
|
|
|
- Mobile version better from V9
|
|
|
- Some of module are not free
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[15/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE:YES (v8-9-10-11 in continue update)
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: YES
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION: High consumption of resources
|
|
|
* KISS: NO mix and good moduled but not one tool one purpose
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: YES
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board : YES
|
|
|
* Scrum: YES
|
|
|
* Gantt : YES
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: YES
|
|
|
* USABILITY: YES
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://erp.softwareinsider.com/l/246/Odoo
|
|
|
[9.1/10] Project Management 100
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://reviews.financesonline.com/p/odoo/
|
|
|
96% user satisfaction
|
|
|
9.0 score
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
We can use like a completly enviroment... databases, projects, shops, kanban and accounting... and maybe focus on develop our style.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
### OrangeScrum
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: https://www.orangescrum.org/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA:
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/Orangescrum/orangescrum/
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- Linux Machine x64
|
|
|
- python
|
|
|
- PostgreSQL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- 10 Languages
|
|
|
- Time tracking live
|
|
|
- Good messaging style
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- No recurring task
|
|
|
- Its not for more of 50 user
|
|
|
- Mobile version better from V9
|
|
|
- Some of module are not free
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[12/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: v1.6.1 16-08-31 BAD
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: NO
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: YES
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: YES
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board : YES
|
|
|
* Scrum: YES
|
|
|
* Gantt : YES
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): NO
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: NO
|
|
|
* USABILITY: YES
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://project-management.softwareinsider.com/l/245/OrangeScrum
|
|
|
[8/10]
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://reviews.financesonline.com/p/orangescrum/
|
|
|
100% user satisfaction
|
|
|
8.2 score
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
We can use more or less like OCP and Github
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Web2Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
web2project is a web-based, multi-user, multi-language Project Management application. It is an open-source software and free for any uses and is maintained by an open community of volunteer programmers. web2project, as collaborative software, allows for real-time interaction between task assignees and updates for stakeholders.
|
|
|
|
|
|
web2Project is an Open Source system for online project management. It is based on an AMP-stack which means it is designed to run on Apache, MySQL, and PHP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The best part is that it's free software. That means you can use it, extend it, customize it, delete it, change the colors of things, and even break it... all for free. We won't (and can't) demand payment, but that also means you can't demand help. Well, you can but then you look like a jerk and no one wants that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: http://web2project.net/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web2project
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/web2project/web2project
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- Linux Machine x64
|
|
|
- apache
|
|
|
- php
|
|
|
- mysql
|
|
|
- gd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Calendar included
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- Old Graphics Style
|
|
|
- No mobile version
|
|
|
- Not agile tools
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[12/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: v3.3 14-11-07 BAD
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: YES
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: NO
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: OLD
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : NO
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board : NO
|
|
|
* Scrum: NO
|
|
|
* Gantt : YES
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): NO
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: NO
|
|
|
* USABILITY: NO
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://scrutinizer-ci.com/g/web2project/web2project/
|
|
|
[5.96]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
Sorry but i think we dont want to use this software because I feel like is abandoned
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Taiga.io
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taiga is a free and open-source project management system for startups, Agile developers, and designers. Its frontend is written in AngularJS and CoffeeScript; backend, in Django and Python.
|
|
|
Started to develop on 2014 and now more or less mature software with many users
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: https://taiga.io/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taiga_(project_management)
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/taigaio/taiga-back
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- Linux Machine x64
|
|
|
- python
|
|
|
- mysql
|
|
|
- gd
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Separated front - backend
|
|
|
- Good API
|
|
|
- Integrate Github
|
|
|
- Mobile app
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
- No mobile version
|
|
|
- Not agile tools
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[14/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: v3.1.0 17-03-10 GOOD
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: YES
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: YES
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: YES
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board : YES
|
|
|
* Scrum: YES
|
|
|
* Gantt : NO
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: NO
|
|
|
* USABILITY: YES
|
|
|
Taiga won the 2015 Most Valued Agile Tool awarded by the Agile Portal
|
|
|
https://opensource.com/business/16/3/top-project-management-tools-2016
|
|
|
Taiga is a tool that aims to solve the basic problem of software usability. Designed with this sole aim, the developers claim it's beautiful to look at all day long
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://reviews.financesonline.com/p/taiga/
|
|
|
97% user satisfaction
|
|
|
7.9 score
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
We can use like OCP and Gitlab in OCW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Collabtive
|
|
|
Collabtive is a web-based project management software published as free software. It provides an open source alternative to proprietary tools like Basecamp, Asana and Trello.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Project start on 2008 but i dont find any new documentation to
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: https://collabtive.o-dyn.de
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collabtive
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/philippK-de/Collabtive
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- php
|
|
|
- mysql
|
|
|
- apache
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- 35 languages
|
|
|
- Integrate Github
|
|
|
- Mobile app
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- Not very customiced
|
|
|
- No mobile version
|
|
|
- Not agile tools
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[10/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: v3.1 2017-09-19 GOOD
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: YES
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: YES
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: NO
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : NO
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board : NO
|
|
|
* Scrum: NO
|
|
|
* Gantt : YES
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: NO
|
|
|
* USABILITY: NO
|
|
|
Demo is not working
|
|
|
No found reviews, i used this software on 2012 and is very simple and i think is not for our ecosystem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
We can use it like OCW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Openproject
|
|
|
OpenProject is a web-based project management system for location-independent team collaboration.
|
|
|
In addition to numerous smaller OpenProject installations there are also some very large installations in global organizations with more than 2,500 projects
|
|
|
|
|
|
The project started on 2012 and now is a matured software
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: https://www.openproject.org/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenProject
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/opf/openproject
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- linux machine
|
|
|
- mysql
|
|
|
- apache
|
|
|
- ruby
|
|
|
- angularjs
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Very good to organize projects
|
|
|
- Modern design
|
|
|
- Mobile app
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- Bugfixing is a little bit slow
|
|
|
- no export Cost Reports
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[15/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: V7.3.1 GOOD
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: YES
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: YES
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: YES
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES
|
|
|
* Kanaban Board : YES
|
|
|
* Scrum: YES
|
|
|
* Gantt : YES
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: YES
|
|
|
* USABILITY: YES
|
|
|
http://project-management.softwareinsider.com/l/818/OpenProject
|
|
|
[5.5/10]
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://www.capterra.com/p/152761/OpenProject/
|
|
|
4/5
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
We can use it like OCP and Github
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Wekan
|
|
|
Its a software for using kanban techniques in the project manager issues
|
|
|
Wekan allows to create Boards, on which Cards can be moved around between a number of Columns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The project start on 2015 and is young to consider a PM but good like a kanban.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: https://wekan.github.io/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA:
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/wekan/wekan
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- Node.js
|
|
|
- MongoDB
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Like Trello
|
|
|
- Public and private
|
|
|
- Markdown edit
|
|
|
- Drag and Drop images
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- No recurring task
|
|
|
- No calendar view
|
|
|
- No accounting hours
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[10/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: V0.54 17-11-02 GOOD
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: NO
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: YES
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: YES
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : NO
|
|
|
* Kanban Board : YES
|
|
|
* Scrum: NO
|
|
|
* Gantt : NO
|
|
|
* Projects view search : NO
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: NO
|
|
|
* USABILITY: YES
|
|
|
https://reviews.financesonline.com/p/wekan/
|
|
|
99% user satisfaction
|
|
|
7.8 score
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
We can use it like OCP and Github, but not complete.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Kanboard
|
|
|
Kanban project management software
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kanboard is not for everybody, it's made for people who want to manage their projects efficiently and simply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
The project start on 2014 and looks like serious but without publicity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: https://kanboard.net/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA:
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/kanboard
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Requirements:
|
|
|
- linux machine
|
|
|
- php
|
|
|
- python
|
|
|
- ngix
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- Simple
|
|
|
- Recurring task
|
|
|
- Subtask
|
|
|
- Create tasks by email
|
|
|
- Command linue interface
|
|
|
- Mobile app
|
|
|
- RocketChat plugin
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- No recurring task
|
|
|
- Low community
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rating:[14/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: V1.0.48 17-10-26 GOOD
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: YES
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: YES
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: YES
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES plugin
|
|
|
* Kanban Board : YES
|
|
|
* Scrum: YES
|
|
|
* Gantt : YESv
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: NO
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets: NO
|
|
|
* USABILITY: YES
|
|
|
https://www.networkworld.com/article/2926213/opensource-subnet/kan-you-do-kanban-yes-you-kan-with-kanboard-and-its-foss.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you haven’t explored Kanban as a project or process management strategy, this may be the lowest cost, lowest drag, and most elegant way for you to test it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
https://project-management.zone/system/kanboard,taiga,trello
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* How we will use it:
|
|
|
We can use it like OCP and Github
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### TaskBoard
|
|
|
|
|
|
A Kanban-inspired app for keeping track of things that need to get done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
* WEBSITE: https://wekan.github.io/
|
|
|
* WIKIPEDIA:
|
|
|
* CODE: https://github.com/kiswa/TaskBoard
|
|
|
|
|
|
Too simple... no hours account
|
|
|
|
|
|
No more testing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * *
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## ERPNEXT
|
|
|
|
|
|
ERPNext is a free and open-source integrated Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) software developed by Frappé Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and is built on MariaDB database system using a Python based server-side framework.
|
|
|
|
|
|
ERPNext is an alternative to NetSuite and QAD, and similar in function to Odoo (formerly OpenERP), Tryton and Openbravo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Start project on 2008 is a matured software
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Requirements: [Software requirements]
|
|
|
- Complete linux machine
|
|
|
- python
|
|
|
- MariaDB
|
|
|
- NodeJS
|
|
|
- Redis
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Comparisons with similar:
|
|
|
- Pros:
|
|
|
- A lot of languages
|
|
|
- Easy to manage
|
|
|
- Mobile version
|
|
|
- Free Software community very implicated
|
|
|
- Cont:
|
|
|
- Complete ERP
|
|
|
- Not very clear kanban/track hour
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Rating:[16/20]
|
|
|
|
|
|
* LAST UPDATE: YES (v9.2 30-11-17)
|
|
|
* PLUGINS/MODULES: YES
|
|
|
* DECENTRALIZED: NO
|
|
|
* DISTRIBUTED: NO
|
|
|
* CONSUMPTION:
|
|
|
* KISS: YES if disable other modules
|
|
|
* DOCUMENTATION: YES (https://erpnext.org/docs/user/manual/en/)
|
|
|
* CONTROL VERSION: YES (https://github.com/frappe/erpnext)
|
|
|
* BASICS:
|
|
|
* Task Management : YES
|
|
|
* Time Tracking : YES
|
|
|
* Discussing : YES plugin
|
|
|
* Kanban Board : YES
|
|
|
* Scrum: NO
|
|
|
* Gantt : YES
|
|
|
* Projects view search : YES
|
|
|
* Roles (privacy when its need): YES
|
|
|
* Several users assigned to the task: YES
|
|
|
* Several timing and individual account on tickets:YES
|
|
|
* USABILITY: YES
|
|
|
>[100%, 8.5]
|
|
|
https://reviews.financesonline.com/p/erpnext/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## How we will use it:
|
|
|
We can use only for invoices disabling other modules or we can try to use like a ERP, having CRM, Project Manager and Invoices...
|
|
|
|
|
|
* * * |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |