### Internal Trust Protocol before assuming FairCoop responsibilities (DRAFT proposal)
**1. Introduction**
The FairCoop family is growing; every day there are more synergies, more people join the ecosystem and more local nodes are being activated throughout the planet. We are many and diverse. We're all connected and we're all going to one, with common goals.
As we don't always have the opportunity to work face-to-face, meet somewhere on the planet, look us in the eye... it would be interesting to work on a proposal that includes information and references among activists, such as a transparent system of reputation and trust among us for:
Preserve trust in the FairCoop project
Not to expose the reputation of the colleagues working on the project
Strengthen our networks of trust with other related projects / possible alliances
Encourage the participation and inclusion of new activists
(...)
**2. List of tasks defined as "responsibility" (or sensitive)**
Permissions for major social networks: https://git.fairkom.net/faircoop/MediaCommunication/wikis/Faircoop-Social-Networks
Permissions WordPress edition / website
Permissions to administer our main services and/or access private data
Official post management
Forum/discourse
-...
**3. Profile proposal**
All positions of responsibility in FairCoop should be assumed by:
comrades who are actively demonstrating their good work and commitment to FairCoop
partners who are promoting local processes (active nodes) and/or establishing synergies with other collectives expanding the FairCoop seed
comrades who have participated and/or are participating in movements and initiatives related to our principles (from libertarian, anarchist, internationalist, hacker, decoupling, ecologist, etc.)
partners who do not currently have open conflict resolution processes in the community
regular participants in the assemblies and the Open Coop Work process.
!! NOTE: voluntary, altruistic, unpaid work that may have been carried out under the project over time will also be valued;)
**4. Procedure**
All persons who are likely to take on (sensitive?) responsibilities in FairCoop should be proposed prior to the General Assembly, either by themselves or by third parties.
If there is a candidacy* to take on a "responsibility" task, a collective appraisal process would be initiated (after the GA) where the person in question would have to be endorsed/backed by at least 3 people of trust who know and attest to their suitability/goodness according to the profiles developed in point 3 of this proposal.
It would be the responsibility of the General Assembly to decide with the candidate:
who
assumes what
for how long
and under what conditions of follow-up/transparency/collective permanent evaluation.
