Trust_Protocol_proposal_faircoop_responsabilities_en.md

@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ The FairCoop family is growing; every day there are more synergies, more people
 As we do not always have the opportunity to meet physically somewhere on the planet or to work face-to-face with each other... it would be interesting to work on a proposal that encourages the sharing of information between activists, such as an internal protocol of trust and transparency between us for:
 
 - Preserving trust in the FairCoop project
-- Not to expose the reputation of those working on the project
+- Prevention of damage to the image of the FairCoop project and/or those working on it
 - Strengthen our networks of trust with other related projects / possible alliances
 - Encourage the participation and inclusion of new activists
 (...)
@@ -46,9 +46,9 @@ All positions of responsibility in FairCoop should be assumed by:
 
 **4. Procedure**
 
-All persons who are likely to take on responsibility (sensitive?) tasks in FairCoop should be proposed beforehand at the respective area assemblies, either by themselves or by third parties.
+All persons who are likely to take on responsibility for (sensitive?) tasks in FairCoop should be proposed beforehand at the respective area assemblies, either by themselves or by third parties.
 
-If there is a candidacy* to take on a "responsibility" task, a collective appraisal process would be initiated (after the GA) where the person in question would have to be supported/guaranteed by at least 3 trustworthy people who know and attest to his/her suitability/goodness according to the profiles developed in point 3 of this proposal (may or may not be from his/her area).
+If there is a candidacy* to take on a "responsible" task, a collective appraisal process would be initiated (after the GA) where the person in question would have to be supported/guaranteed by at least 3 trustworthy people who know and attest to his/her suitability/reliability according to the profiles developed in point 3 of this proposal (may or may not be from his/her area).
 
 The area assemblies would be responsible for deciding together with the candidate (and in any case with a possible GA approval):