| ... | ... | @@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ All persons who are likely to take on responsibility (sensitive?) tasks in FairC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If there is a candidacy* to take on a "responsibility" task, a collective appraisal process would be initiated (after the GA) where the person in question would have to be supported/guaranteed by at least 3 trustworthy people who know and attest to his/her suitability/goodness according to the profiles developed in point 3 of this proposal (may or may not be from his/her area).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would be the responsibility of the General Assembly to decide with the candidate:
|
|
|
|
The area assemblies would be responsible for deciding together with the candidate (and in any case with a possible GA approval):
|
|
|
|
who
|
|
|
|
assumes what
|
|
|
|
for how long
|
| ... | ... | |
